NeuroMap Profiling + Implementation System

Assessment creates evidence. NeuroMap turns it into a living learner map.

NeuroMap connects assessment findings, observations and professional insight into one integrated profile — then turns that profile into priorities, coordinated implementation and reviewable progress.

Different evidence sources connecting into a NeuroMap profile, priorities, implementation and review
Connectfragmented evidence
Profileinterconnected patterns
Implementshared priorities
Reviewwhat is working
The gap NeuroMap is built to solve

The problem is not a lack of assessment. It is what happens after the assessment.

Educational assessments can produce valuable evidence, but the information often remains distributed across scores, reports, observations, professional opinions and different settings.

Families and schools can understand what has been found and still be left without one joined-up answer to the practical questions that follow.

  • Which findings connect?
  • Which patterns matter most in everyday learning?
  • What should be prioritised first?
  • Who should do what across home, school and additional support?
  • How will we know whether the support is helping?
The NeuroMap proposition

Assessment is the starting point. NeuroMap is what happens next.

NeuroMap provides a structured pathway for converting complex evidence into an integrated learner profile and then carrying that understanding through into implementation and review.

EvidenceProfilePrioritiesImplementationProgress
The NeuroMap architecture

One connected system from evidence to progress.

Rather than treating assessment, recommendations and support as separate events, NeuroMap links them into a continuous, reviewable pathway.

01

Evidence Layer

Assessment findings, parent and teacher observations, learner voice, professional information and educational context remain visible as distinct evidence sources.

03

Priority Layer

Complex information is reduced to a manageable set of priorities instead of becoming another long, unstructured recommendation list.

05

Review Layer

Support is reviewed against agreed indicators so strategies can be continued, adjusted or stopped as the learner and context change.

The two core NeuroMap layers

Profile the learner. Then implement the map.

CORE 01

NeuroMap Profiling

Bring together existing assessment evidence, feedback and targeted additional profiling where useful. The aim is not another score summary; it is an integrated explanation of the patterns shaping learning and everyday functioning.

  • Connect evidence without losing its source.
  • Identify interrelationships and discrepancies.
  • Translate findings into functional understanding.
  • Define a smaller number of meaningful priorities.
Explore NeuroMap Profiling
CORE 02

Implementation & Progress

Carry the profile into real life. NeuroMap organises priorities into role-specific action, clarifies responsibilities and defines what will be reviewed rather than allowing the report to become a static endpoint.

  • Shared priorities across the support network.
  • Clear actions for relevant roles.
  • Observable review indicators.
  • Refine support in response to evidence.
Explore Implementation
From founder-led method to repeatable system

Built from real educational practice. Structured for a more scalable future.

NeuroMap is currently delivered through founder-led professional work. That matters: the framework is being shaped around the messy reality of assessment evidence, school constraints, family questions and the need for practical implementation.

The development direction is to make the NeuroMap method increasingly structured and repeatable — so the value sits not only in one practitioner’s judgement, but in a clear framework that can support consistent workflows, collaborative use and future technology-assisted delivery.

Important: NeuroMap does not claim to replace educational psychologists, teachers or other professionals. The system is designed to organise and connect evidence, priorities, implementation and review around their expertise.

NOW

Founder-led delivery

Real cases, professional interpretation, profiling, implementation planning and review.

STRUCTURE

Repeatable NeuroMap framework

Consistent evidence architecture, profile logic, priority structure, role-specific implementation and review cycle.

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION

Technology-supported workflow

A future digital layer can support information capture, visual profiling, collaboration, implementation tracking and progress review while preserving professional judgement.

Recommendations are not implementation. NeuroMap connects the two.
See the system working

From scattered evidence to one coherent direction.

The fictional example shows how separate evidence sources can be retained, connected and translated into a profile, practical priorities and a review plan.

Fictional illustration — not a real child’s data

Evidence

Assessment findings + parent observations + teacher observations + learner voice + professional observations.

Pattern

Strong conceptual reasoning alongside comparatively weaker working memory and slower processing.

Implementation direction

Preserve challenge while reducing avoidable memory load, externalising task structure and allowing appropriate processing time.

Explore the Full Fictional NeuroMap
Evidence sources feeding into a NeuroMap profile, priorities and support
Professional delivery today

Assessment supports NeuroMap. It does not define NeuroMap.

Families and schools can enter the pathway at different points. Where adequate evidence already exists, NeuroMap can begin from that evidence. Where important questions remain unanswered, professional assessment may be one input into the wider system.

01

Existing assessment available

Use NeuroMap Profiling to connect the evidence, understand the patterns and identify priorities.

Start with profiling →
02

Evidence is incomplete

Professional psychoeducational assessment can build the evidence base before the wider profile and implementation pathway.

Explore assessment →
03

Profile understood, action unclear

Move directly into implementation, shared priorities and progress review.

Explore implementation →

View Professional Services

The origin of NeuroMap

Developed by Liat Soresman

NeuroMap grew from a repeated problem seen across assessment, SEN leadership, international schools and specialist learning support: good evidence existed, but the pathway from evidence to coordinated everyday action was often fragmented.

Read the founder story →

Founder-market fit

More than two decades seeing the same gap from different sides.

Liat’s multidisciplinary background spans speech and language, educational psychology, international-school SEN leadership, assessment and exam access arrangements. NeuroMap is an attempt to turn that accumulated practical knowledge into a clearer, repeatable system.

20+ years multidisciplinary experience100+ detailed assessmentsInternational schools
NeuroMap Systems

From evidence to profile. From profile to implementation. From implementation to progress.

Explore the system, see a fictional profile or talk to us about the starting point for a learner, school or future collaboration.